I should be ashamed, part 32435

Film & books

Moderators: Eviltoastman, Don Eduardo, Rick Cave, judasmuppet

Post Reply
User avatar
BABY SHAKER
poofy
Posts: 1586
Joined: 22 Jan 2005, 18:34

I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by BABY SHAKER »

I will be viewing blade runner in the very near future for the very first time in my existence.


:oops:
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
your rank here
Posts: 944
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 09:16
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: the Delbert.
Contact:

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by ReverseEngineer »

which version?
User avatar
BABY SHAKER
poofy
Posts: 1586
Joined: 22 Jan 2005, 18:34

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by BABY SHAKER »

Image

delightful?
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
your rank here
Posts: 944
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 09:16
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: the Delbert.
Contact:

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by ReverseEngineer »

haven't seen that one.
I don't even think I've seen the "director's cut"
mine was chock full of unnecessary voice-over narration.
User avatar
crotchgrabber
poofy
Posts: 1176
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 14:25
Missin' Jimmy level: 89000

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by crotchgrabber »

i've got some wierd set, that apparently has every version ever made.
what's funny is it's on that obsolete 'high def' dvd.
Mr John wrote:You love cock.
User avatar
Mobiesque
deputy wert
Posts: 495
Joined: 23 Sep 2003, 03:45
Missin' Jimmy level: 666
Location: Mein Kampf-fires burnin' bright!

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by Mobiesque »

Much less embarrassing without the narration (Director's Cut version)

Also isn't the ending different in the original release? As in, a happy ending as opposed to the book.

Kinda like tears in rain, if you ask me.
'the fuck did I do?
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
your rank here
Posts: 944
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 09:16
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: the Delbert.
Contact:

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by ReverseEngineer »

God, I saw it like fifteen years ago
I don't even remember the ending.

Time to watch again, yeah?
User avatar
Mr John
your rank here
Posts: 928
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 21:42
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: up in your shit

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by Mr John »

I've only ever seen the Director's and Final Cuts.

Bought the latter on blu-ray, have no idea what the film would be like with "narration". Still love it and the soundtrack.
:)
"Bof."
User avatar
touchy feely
your rank here
Posts: 885
Joined: 28 Jul 2004, 19:21
Missin' Jimmy level: 903
Location: midwestern united states

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by touchy feely »

the narration dumbs it way down for sure
avoiding the original theatrical version is a good idea
final cut is the most enjoyable
:doubt:
User avatar
Grotocult
your rank here
Posts: 965
Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 19:15
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: I live in Canada now.
Contact:

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by Grotocult »

It's alright. Some nice imagery. Japanese cities. Sean Young being a babe.
Hardly the masterpiece people make it out to be, and not much to do with the novel or Philip K Dick.
And before you ask, no he's not a replicunt.
User avatar
Mr John
your rank here
Posts: 928
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 21:42
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: up in your shit

Re: I should be ashamed, part 32435

Post by Mr John »

Err, it's set in LA? Opening shot of the city, title - "Los Angeles 2019".
:|

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/plotsummary

I believe the theory behind this future vision is that the Asian economies more or less dominate the world, so America looks more like Tokyo, or Chinatown in LA has expanded to absorb most of the city, while pollution has driven most of the richer/healthier population emigrates to off-world colonies.

I do remember you saying you did not like the soundtrack a while ago, I guess the film didn't leave as strong an impression on you mate. I fucking love it.
:wink:
"Bof."
Post Reply