Page 1 of 1
man or astro-man?
Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 10:04
by BABY SHAKER
that is not the question. this is: what are your thoughts on this band?
I heard and enjoyed a little bit of what is probably their "worst" record.
of course I am referring to
spectrum of infinite scale.
I seem to have a habit of approaching bands at all the wrong times and from all the wrong angles.
under bridge water.
let us reflect upon this band and journey beyond "awesome" and "sux".
I am in a very strange frame of mind right now.

Re: man or astro-man?
Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 10:59
by clitty litter
what's not to like about these boys? sci-fi outerspace surf-rock rockabilly punks
transmissions from uranus will continue to be classic for generations to come
Re: man or astro-man?
Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 11:22
by BABY SHAKER
ok, that's the live one, correct?
here's something else to chew up and wash down with a glass of hmmmmm...
should live recordings be used as reliable introductions? I realize that there are
quality and horrendous live records out there, but what I am getting at is...
should one be semi familiar with a band's music before he/she cracks the live case?
this question could very well be answered with a yes or a no. it just depends on who
I am asking, right? well... right now it is you. proceed at your own natural pace.

Re: man or astro-man?
Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 11:39
by clitty litter
fuk the dum shit. i got transmissions from uranus on (picture) vinyl and disc.
much music out tha doesnt translate well in the studio. case in point - man OR astroman. none of their studio efforts comes close to even the recorded reproduction of their live jams. jam.
unrelated ::
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDAMTu365yA
Re: man or astro-man?
Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 18:03
by Dress Barn
I dig them- but don't know any albums.
I caught them live in the 90's and had a blast
Re: man or astro-man?
Posted: 23 Oct 2011, 07:44
by BABY SHAKER
alrighty, the live stuff is a keeper.