Quantum of Solace
Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 08:52
Theme
http://www.theboombox.com/2008/09/18/al ... -new-song/
Page 1 of 2
Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 06:50
Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 14:26
the other day a girl told me her favorite bond ever was pierce brosnon.
i was too shocked to beat her.
i was too shocked to beat her.
Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 20:12
no man that would be pedophilia
Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 21:19
thatscrotchgrabber";p="980960 wrote:the other day a girl told me her favorite bond ever was pierce brosnon.
i was too shocked to beat her.
really not that bad
Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 22:09
I've never enjoyed Bond movies.
But I liked the Goldeneye video game.
I do like Pierce Brosnan.
But I liked the Goldeneye video game.
I do like Pierce Brosnan.
Posted: 22 Sep 2008, 18:21
i've always loved that.erutlucorgga";p="981050 wrote:no man that would be pedophilia
Posted: 23 Sep 2008, 19:38
and syphillis
Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 12:04
fuck yeah!
Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 12:13
And philcunt.
Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 04:30
My mum's favourite is George Lazenby.
Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 05:44
Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 06:15
I just wish George Baker (my other avatar) had got his chance.
</pointless trivia>
Was also in OHMSS (Lazenby's voiceover) and Spy Who Loved Me.http://www.teletronic.co.uk/georgebaker.htm wrote:After recovering from his heart attack George remained active with Candida Plays and produced 35 plays over the next 5 years until he had to wind up the company in 1971. During all this time, George was still in great demand to appear in Film & TV with a string of appearances to his name in amongst others, “Gideon’s Way”, “Curse of The Fly”, “The Baron“, the first of 3 Bond movies, an unaccredited part as a N.A.S.A. engineer, in “You Only Live Twice” (1967) with Sean Connery as 007, a part Ian Fleming wanted George for.
</pointless trivia>
Posted: 02 Oct 2008, 07:03
Posted: 10 Nov 2008, 08:32
Saw it on Friday. It's above average.
Very kinetic, very blunt, but also too much shaky-cam. Were I a stunt man and I choreographed a scene for months, only to have a director reduce it to an epileptic 5 second blur, I'd be furious.
3.5 out of 5
Very kinetic, very blunt, but also too much shaky-cam. Were I a stunt man and I choreographed a scene for months, only to have a director reduce it to an epileptic 5 second blur, I'd be furious.
3.5 out of 5
Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 02:19
haha you mean reduced it to a bourne movie?
Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 03:44
Yup!
Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 09:20
well that's not surprising, there's only so far and only so many gadgets they could do with the relentlessly tongue-in-cheek pierce brosnan era
Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 10:04
Zero gadgets here, just exaggerated mobile phone capabilities.
Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 17:15
my fav is when they zoom into surveilance foto's on "24" .
that shit kills me .
i dont know what software they have , it must be like microsoft paint PRO .
but speaking of james bond films we havent seen any since since roger moore .
am i missing anything here ? i mean i was a huge fan of all the original bond , but these newer movies just dont seem to have it , am i wrong?
that shit kills me .
i dont know what software they have , it must be like microsoft paint PRO .
but speaking of james bond films we havent seen any since since roger moore .
am i missing anything here ? i mean i was a huge fan of all the original bond , but these newer movies just dont seem to have it , am i wrong?
Posted: 12 Nov 2008, 01:09
He rulesMr John Vista";p="982392 wrote:My mum's favourite is George Lazenby.
I can't take this new guy seriously, he looks like a muscly Houellebecq (with the new Miss Moneypenny)
Posted: 14 Nov 2008, 06:38
Saw this yesterday. It was a bit boring IMO. Probably due to the lack of sex scenes. Two hours, and the only cleavage shown is Bonds? What the fuck?
Posted: 14 Nov 2008, 07:06
Posted: 14 Nov 2008, 13:36
Nam Tsao";p="982156 wrote:And philcunt.
Haven't seen this yet, but am planning on it before the end of its cinema run.
Don't worry, I'll keep you all updated.
Posted: 14 Nov 2008, 17:17
that was actually one of Ebert's negative marks on the film.Thunder Bear";p="993932 wrote:Saw this yesterday. It was a bit boring IMO. Probably due to the lack of sex scenes. Two hours, and the only cleavage shown is Bonds? What the fuck?
Mostly, he didn't think it was grandiose enough.