Posted: 07 May 2007, 18:51
<< checkmate!
Page 12 of 26
Posted: 07 May 2007, 19:02
Posted: 07 May 2007, 19:05
if by boring you mean awesomely rad/sweet?
Posted: 07 May 2007, 19:12
Posted: 08 May 2007, 03:51
And when I said scholar, I was obviously (1. why is this obvious) not referring to any aspect pertaining to intellect (2. you clearly stated that my spelling mistake equated to me being "even more fucking dumb"). You form your rebuttal on the soul (3. Spelling) basis of this act (see point 2). You cried foul on his intellectual skills, yes, but one must assume that before you can criticize someone's intellect, you must at least be up to snuff on most fundamentals of modern intelligence, which I believe definitely holds under it's category such things as spelling, grammar, syntax and composition.(as I have stated of the four, spelling - unless you completely use the wrong word, for example "soul" instead of "sole" which affects semantics - is the least important of the them, especially on an informal symposium such as a web forum about pop music.) These might not be signs of low intellect, but to criticize someone else's validity as a thinking human being while one's own communication skills are of a questionable nature might lead other thinking human beings to assume you are a hypocritical douche bag(4.Elaborate. The argument is not supported, no examples are cited and you're trailing off into abuse which neutralises any valid points which you may have made earlier) In closing, I strongly suggest you take a large, infected, novelty sized heroin needle, fill it full to the brim with a cocktail of cheap champagne and the blood of an AIDs infected Asian with bad fashion sense, shove it directly into your asshole, press plunger until solution has completely emptied into rectum, lather, rinse and repeat.(Lost points through poor insult. Asinine abuse thinly veiled as a witty rebuttal)
F
You simply must try harder, if you are to be the champion of your cause, you may wish to think a little harder and longer and where possible take a deep breath and actually think before you smash your face into the keyboard in the vain hope that was is produced makes some semblance of a decent remark or response. Don't give up hope, the meat on the bones is rotten and the skeleton itself has been assembled by a crazed pathologist, but with some reworking you may be able to construct a paragraph that is both cohesive, coherent and maybe even worthy of a pat on the back.
F
You simply must try harder, if you are to be the champion of your cause, you may wish to think a little harder and longer and where possible take a deep breath and actually think before you smash your face into the keyboard in the vain hope that was is produced makes some semblance of a decent remark or response. Don't give up hope, the meat on the bones is rotten and the skeleton itself has been assembled by a crazed pathologist, but with some reworking you may be able to construct a paragraph that is both cohesive, coherent and maybe even worthy of a pat on the back.
Posted: 08 May 2007, 04:00
you guys seriously need to stop thinking and speaking in binary
you'd make more sense
and probably enjoy yourselves more
you'd make more sense
and probably enjoy yourselves more
Posted: 08 May 2007, 04:02
10001110101
Posted: 08 May 2007, 04:18
edit for double post on account of spelling error
Posted: 08 May 2007, 04:19
And when I said scholar, I was obviously (1. why is this obvious) not referring to any aspect pertaining to intellect (2. you clearly stated that my spelling mistake equated to me being "even more fucking dumb"). You form your rebuttal on the soul (3. Spelling) basis of this act (see point 2). You cried foul on his intellectual skills, yes, but one must assume that before you can criticize someone's intellect, you must at least be up to snuff on most fundamentals of modern intelligence, which I believe definitely holds under it's category such things as spelling, grammar, syntax and composition.(as I have stated of the four, spelling - unless you completely use the wrong word, for example "soul" instead of "sole" which affects semantics - is the least important of the them, especially on an informal symposium such as a web forum about pop music.) These might not be signs of low intellect, but to criticize someone else's validity as a thinking human being while one's own communication skills are of a questionable nature might lead other thinking human beings to assume you are a hypocritical douche bag(4.Elaborate. The argument is not supported, no examples are cited and you're trailing off into abuse which neutralises any valid points which you may have made earlier) In closing, I strongly suggest you take a large, infected, novelty sized heroin needle, fill it full to the brim with a cocktail of cheap champagne and the blood of an AIDs infected Asian with bad fashion sense, shove it directly into your asshole, press plunger until solution has completely emptied into rectum, lather, rinse and repeat.(Lost points through poor insult. Asinine abuse thinly veiled as a witty rebuttal)
F
You simply must try harder, if you are to be the champion of your cause, you may wish to think a little harder and longer and where possible take a deep breath and actually think before you smash your face into the keyboard in the vain hope that was is produced makes some semblance of a decent remark or response. Don't give up hope, the meat on the bones is rotten and the skeleton itself has been assembled by a crazed pathologist, but with some reworking you may be able to construct a paragraph that is both cohesive, coherent and maybe even worthy of a pat on the back.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA. I wasn't, like, being serious. I was satirizing your stupid, pedantic, try hard post trying to sound smart to "prove me wrong". Hence the end where I trail off into calling you a douchebag and then say some ridiculous little kid insult. I figured that would have tipped you off that I was being tongue-in-cheek. Your first posts proved nothing except that you're not only an idiot, but an annoying psuedo intellectual idiot. And your little inserts into my post didn't prove anything either.
Posted: 08 May 2007, 04:26
Control your vitriol, smacking the post button in quick succession makes you appear manic. Sorry if I have affected you adversely, puto.
Posted: 08 May 2007, 04:29
OK, buddy 
You keep on livin' that life of yours.
You keep on livin' that life of yours.
Posted: 08 May 2007, 21:15
This is such a great album
Posted: 08 May 2007, 21:40
If only it came in suppository form...
Posted: 08 May 2007, 21:47
Then me and Hank would be ass to ass...
Posted: 09 May 2007, 00:57
damn thing's grown on me...the over/under is 5 listens
Posted: 09 May 2007, 01:09
What do you know, Rob Zombie movies suck
Posted: 09 May 2007, 02:05
For god's sake people!
*LOCKED!*
*LOCKED!*
Posted: 09 May 2007, 02:16
Let's just say that I'm well fed and you Biafrans are fucking starved.Russ Nelson wrote:Everyone has likely had the experience of going grocery shopping before dinner. Everything on the shelves looks so good. Doing the same shopping after dinner will produce different results, and yet the groceries haven't changed. You have, so you place different values on the foods. If food had an intrinsic value, you would purchase the same food before or after dinner.
Posted: 09 May 2007, 02:51
let me just say that your live, grandiose, unsimulated death is collectively desired.
Posted: 09 May 2007, 02:59
Elaborate. Support what you say. You are not a collective, or even a representative of a group. However you are a collective of undesirable cells joined together to form a human cuntface*.
Edit: After seeing the image below on your myspace profile, I know I'm conversing at a fundamentalist and any reasonable discourse will naturally fail. As such I have decided to place you on ignore. If you wish to talk at me, pm Floodmatt and he'll pass on the message. From this point forward, direct contact is prohibited as you have font-herpes*.
*Fact.
Edit: After seeing the image below on your myspace profile, I know I'm conversing at a fundamentalist and any reasonable discourse will naturally fail. As such I have decided to place you on ignore. If you wish to talk at me, pm Floodmatt and he'll pass on the message. From this point forward, direct contact is prohibited as you have font-herpes*.
*Fact.
Posted: 09 May 2007, 03:56
George Bush doesn't care about black people
Posted: 09 May 2007, 07:50
still no pm's..
Posted: 09 May 2007, 08:20
Nam Tsao";p="874352 wrote:
Posted: 09 May 2007, 13:59
poop camp";p="874324 wrote:Then me and Hank would be ass to ass...
Posted: 09 May 2007, 15:41
I'd vote for him. Why not?