Kill Bill

Film & books

Moderators: Eviltoastman, Don Eduardo, Rick Cave, judasmuppet

User avatar
judasmuppet
cute as a crackbaby
Posts: 12726
Joined: 04 Oct 2005, 07:09
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: Luis was right

Post by judasmuppet »

I don't judge it solely on the homage thing at all. I still find it crap. I reference the homage-angle as me trying to find a redeaming feature, which I still can't do. The fight scenes are surprisingly poor in their execution, and the acting is poor because of the obvious step-by-step direction of Tarantino. You can see it in the mannerisms of the characters, and hear it in the delivery of their lines. I, personally, find that to be a sign of poor direction. I can't see how watching the second part can save that.
I SINCERELY HOPE YOU CUNTS NEVER BUILD PLANES
User avatar
Mobiesque
confusitron
Posts: 5127
Joined: 23 Sep 2003, 03:45
Missin' Jimmy level: 666
Location: Mein Kampf-fires burnin' bright!

Post by Mobiesque »

Anyone worth a fist full of arseholes is contrary enough to know that any time someone tries the ever-tiring motif of 're-appropriation is a legitimate art form' can suck shit as the resulting piece piece isn't anything more than mindless cinema / art / music / poetry / ghey.

Even my much bandied "jejune pasticcio" is a step up from such unashamed pilphering.

As such, as previously stated, I enjoyed watching 'em once or twice, but I still consider them the most defining point of Tarantino's work, but not in a good way.

Po Mo fucking WANKER.

But Judas, I do think the second is a little better. Though as my gods David and Margret put it years ago, it should have been a single release. It's so easily digestible (unless your pallate is incredibly sensitive) I could have easily swallowed both as a single movie running the same length, in one sitting.

We may as well go out and buy modern Aboriginal artworks :lol: :lol: :lol:
'the fuck did I do?
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
cute as a crackbaby
Posts: 13892
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 09:16
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: the Delbert.
Contact:

Post by ReverseEngineer »

I'll say that I like Jackie Brown better than any other Tarantino movie, though.
User avatar
Roark
not very out-and-about-y
Posts: 15038
Joined: 02 Oct 2003, 20:11
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: Whoop whoop
Contact:

Post by Roark »

Kill Bill was stylish, but seemed really self-conscious to me. A bit try-hard.

I donna give a shit though. It had chicks with katanas in it.
Miss Yvonne wrote:Stop having boring tuna. Stop having a boring life.
Hitman

Post by Hitman »

ReverseEngineer";p="784729 wrote:I'll say that I like Jackie Brown better than any other Tarantino movie, though.
Really?
How come?

Resevoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction do it for me.

Jackie Brown has a really bland vibe for me...
Hitman

Post by Hitman »

Die Zulo Gestalt";p="784751 wrote:Kill Bill was stylish, but seemed really self-conscious to me. A bit try-hard.
I know what you're getting at.
I don't know if I'd say try hard though.

It's not as if it ever took itself too seriously...
Die Zulo Gestalt";p="784751 wrote: I donna give a shit though. It had chicks with katanas in it.
Hell yeah...
lynnjen/mod/skyr
ask me about my yeast infection
Posts: 4693
Joined: 17 Nov 2003, 11:28
Missin' Jimmy level: 0

Post by lynnjen/mod/skyr »

I think it's "kitanas."

I liked Jackie Brown the best as well. It wasn't as over-the-top as Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, etc., but that woman had sass, and that goes far with me. I'd like to have the sass of Jackie.
lynnjen/mod/skyr
ask me about my yeast infection
Posts: 4693
Joined: 17 Nov 2003, 11:28
Missin' Jimmy level: 0

Post by lynnjen/mod/skyr »

Die Zulo Gestalt";p="784751 wrote: It had chicks with katanas in it.
Kitanas aren't as sexy as guns. Think about it. When was the last time you saw a woman hike up her skirt and pull a kitana out of her garter belt?
Hitman

Post by Hitman »

You see, what I like about Tarantino IS his OTT style.
Subtlety doesn't really work for him IMO...
lynnjen/mod/skyr
ask me about my yeast infection
Posts: 4693
Joined: 17 Nov 2003, 11:28
Missin' Jimmy level: 0

Post by lynnjen/mod/skyr »

I didn't find "Jackie" that subtle.
User avatar
Rado
OMG WTF
Posts: 4298
Joined: 10 Jan 2004, 04:45
Missin' Jimmy level: 90
Location: Australia

Post by Rado »

Riddled with terrible actors...
(lingus)";p="997234 wrote:there's enough there for me,
step aside boob glutton
lynnjen/mod/skyr
ask me about my yeast infection
Posts: 4693
Joined: 17 Nov 2003, 11:28
Missin' Jimmy level: 0

Post by lynnjen/mod/skyr »

I SAID PULL A KITANA OUT OF YOUR SKIRT!
User avatar
Roark
not very out-and-about-y
Posts: 15038
Joined: 02 Oct 2003, 20:11
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: Whoop whoop
Contact:

Post by Roark »

K-A-T-A-N-A, wench.

Maybe "try-hard" was too harsh, in hindsight, coz I was pretty psyched when I first saw it. I loved the characters.
Miss Yvonne wrote:Stop having boring tuna. Stop having a boring life.
Hitman

Post by Hitman »

Rado";p="784775 wrote:Riddled with terrible actors...
For real.
Michael Keaton What the fuck??
Talk about a stupid casting decision...
User avatar
Rado
OMG WTF
Posts: 4298
Joined: 10 Jan 2004, 04:45
Missin' Jimmy level: 90
Location: Australia

Post by Rado »

Oh i was talking about Kill Bill...shit except for Michael Madsen...
(lingus)";p="997234 wrote:there's enough there for me,
step aside boob glutton
User avatar
Eviltoastman
Part-time Demi-Mod
Posts: 14790
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 18:12
Favorite Books: .
Missin' Jimmy level: 10
Location: A miserable nation obsessed with the past.

Post by Eviltoastman »

Die Zulo Gestalt";p="784751 wrote:Kill Bill was stylish, but seemed really self-conscious to me. A bit try-hard.

I donna give a shit though. It had chicks with katanas in it.
And lot's of dead Japs!

*flashback to Iwo Jima...masturbates*
Sharppie is my best friend.
Hitman

Post by Hitman »

Rado";p="784802 wrote:Oh i was talking about Kill Bill...shit except for Michael Madsen...
Disagree...
User avatar
Rado
OMG WTF
Posts: 4298
Joined: 10 Jan 2004, 04:45
Missin' Jimmy level: 90
Location: Australia

Post by Rado »

You HAVE to agree with me...
(lingus)";p="997234 wrote:there's enough there for me,
step aside boob glutton
User avatar
Rado
OMG WTF
Posts: 4298
Joined: 10 Jan 2004, 04:45
Missin' Jimmy level: 90
Location: Australia

Post by Rado »

Saw the second one for the first time today. I enjoyed it alot more than Vol. 1. Probably because it had more of Michael Madsen's character and with that Pai Mei dude. He was pretty cool with the constant stroking of his beard.
Highly enjoyed the time from when Elle arrives at Budd's trailer to when she gets her other eye plucked out.
(lingus)";p="997234 wrote:there's enough there for me,
step aside boob glutton
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
cute as a crackbaby
Posts: 13892
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 09:16
Missin' Jimmy level: 0
Location: the Delbert.
Contact:

Post by ReverseEngineer »

"Spoilers"?!?!?!?!?!?!
Thunder Beer
a lustrous shine
Posts: 6132
Joined: 02 Feb 2006, 08:09

Post by Thunder Beer »

ReverseEngineer";p="784729 wrote:I'll say that I like Jackie Brown better than any other Tarantino movie, though.
Yes, Its a great movie, and damn underrated too!

But Dogs is the real masterpiece!


I would also like to add to this thread that Kill Bill vol 2 is a great fucking movie!! I also enjoyed vol 1, but its not up there with the second one... Anyway, they work best together!
Rick Cave";p="924516 wrote: ...once you go Toby you never go back.
Post Reply