Page 2 of 2

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 23:11
by Carcharodon carcharias
Roark wrote:
Penetration Fatback wrote:Turd World Nation
Awesome.

Image.
:-X

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 27 Apr 2013, 09:36
by Roark
Stop chasing after me with your little familiarities and references, man. The intensity of your effort is starting to get really uncomfortable. It's like being persistently nudged with an unwelcome elbow or penis or emaciated ego.

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 11:15
by Carcharodon carcharias
Roark wrote:Stop chasing after me with your little familiarities and references, man. The intensity of your effort is starting to get really uncomfortable. It's like being persistently nudged with an unwelcome elbow or penis or emaciated ego.
I know, we both know fosters sux, but I'm not chasing you. I was just busting your chops because every time I make a comment you appear foaming at the mouth acting like the Dome-icidal maniac that you are.

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 16:57
by SHARPPIE
huh...you seem to view reality a little different than everyone else, don't you?

from all accounts, roark is the one with clear and concise comments. you, on the other hand, seem like a spastic 3 year old with ADHD...that was raised by baboons...in a trailer park...in florida.

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 17:46
by Guest
SHARPPIE wrote:huh...you seem to view reality a little different than everyone else, don't you?

from all accounts, roark is the one with clear and concise comments. you, on the other hand, seem like a spastic 3 year old with ADHD...that was raised by baboons...in a trailer park...in florida.
Don't worry no one has forgetten you are a sociopathic little runt.

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 29 Apr 2013, 01:44
by Eviltoastman
Guest wrote:
SHARPPIE wrote:huh...you seem to view reality a little different than everyone else, don't you?

from all accounts, roark is the one with clear and concise comments. you, on the other hand, seem like a spastic 3 year old with ADHD...that was raised by baboons...in a trailer park...in florida.
Don't worry no one has forgetten you are a sociopathic little runt.
Gambrilism on ABC. Up next, 80lb breasts and Simpson's figures and we discuss the finer points of the Ipecac figurines. Now some messages from our sponsors.

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 29 Apr 2013, 17:49
by Carcharodon carcharias
Eviltoastman wrote:
Guest wrote:
SHARPPIE wrote:huh...you seem to view reality a little different than everyone else, don't you?

from all accounts, roark is the one with clear and concise comments. you, on the other hand, seem like a spastic 3 year old with ADHD...that was raised by baboons...in a trailer park...in florida.
Don't worry no one has forgetten you are a sociopathic little runt.
Gambrilism on ABC. Up next, 80lb breasts and Simpson's figures and we discuss the finer points of the Ipecac figurines. Now some messages from our sponsors.

Gambrilism? you are making shit up again as usual.

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 01:09
by Roark
:shock:

What does that name mean to you, dude? Be honest. Are you an acolyte? Are you the man himself?

Re: is 'the united turds of americaca' a good band name

Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 07:31
by Eviltoastman
I don't know Roark, but he sure as fuck isn't a sponsor.