Page 1 of 2

ø

Posted: 30 Apr 2007, 21:07
by Jeff
Image

Posted: 30 Apr 2007, 22:14
by Jeff
Image

Posted: 30 Apr 2007, 22:30
by Jeff
Image

Posted: 30 Apr 2007, 23:31
by Jeff
Image

Posted: 01 May 2007, 08:50
by floodmatt
whats up with that first one?

Posted: 01 May 2007, 10:11
by Jeff
My neighbor's dog... he's named Bruschi.

Posted: 01 May 2007, 10:33
by Rick Cave
Did you just call Jeff a nerd?

Posted: 01 May 2007, 11:20
by Jeff
Miss Vinter";p="870936 wrote: Do you like Math?
Huh?


I'm like a math genius at my school because I figured out what 516 X 2 is... IN MY HEAD.

Posted: 01 May 2007, 11:20
by Jeff
Rick Cave";p="870937 wrote:Did you just call Jeff a nerd?
She wouldn't be the first. Or incorrect.

Posted: 01 May 2007, 11:20
by judasmuppet
Jesus, H. Christ, Jeff!

Posted: 01 May 2007, 11:23
by Jeff
I gotta fix that second one. Pushed the colors waaaaaaaay to far on that...


These are all pure fucking around with Camera Raw, by the way. I'm noticing that just like with film, you can cool results via poor exposures and then processing to compensate... or just processing a good exposure in some weird way anyway...


digital = the shit

Posted: 01 May 2007, 11:30
by Jeff
judasmuppet";p="870962 wrote:Jesus, H. Christ, Jeff!
huh?

Posted: 01 May 2007, 11:45
by Jeff
Have you ever noticed the number of comparisons photography gets with music? Or the number of photographers with either an intense interest in music or music as a side project? Ansel was a concert pianist (or maybe just tried to be one, in any case he studied it)... W. Eugene Smith spent all his time listen to jazz guys rehearse in his loft... there's a whole bunch of others I can't think of right now...

Music of course has nothing to do with math at all...

Posted: 01 May 2007, 11:46
by Jeff
Miss Vinter";p="870965 wrote:Well, the Math thing; these pics a taken by a geometric thinking brain.
I should mention that these are all pretty extreme crops... many of them where oriented the other why originally.

Posted: 01 May 2007, 12:03
by Jeff
Miss Vinter";p="870983 wrote:I think music has to do with Math aswell...
I should have put a :wink: on that statement.


Music, as we all know, is a sequence of ones and zeros...


:wink: :wink:

Posted: 01 May 2007, 12:20
by Thunder Beer
Your pics has little to do with "ø".

Posted: 01 May 2007, 12:23
by Jeff
My pics have little to do with anything. Hence the null.

Posted: 01 May 2007, 12:51
by floodmatt
Jeff";p="870926 wrote:My neighbor's dog... he's named Bruschi.
well.. i could see that it was a dog..
i was confused as to why the photo looks the way it does..
i just realized that all that white is a building correct?
the lines on top are the shingles?

earlier i had no idea what that was..

Posted: 01 May 2007, 13:41
by Jeff
floodmatt";p="871025 wrote:
Jeff";p="870926 wrote:My neighbor's dog... he's named Bruschi.
well.. i could see that it was a dog..
i was confused as to why the photo looks the way it does..
i just realized that all that white is a building correct?
the lines on top are the shingles?

earlier i had no idea what that was..
Correct.

The sun was shining directly on the building... I exposed for the dog... leaving the building completely blown out...

Posted: 01 May 2007, 14:44
by floodmatt
why did that one little section of shingles appear?

Posted: 01 May 2007, 15:33
by judasmuppet
floodmatt";p="871100 wrote:why did that one little section of shingles appear?
The shadows of the shingles are darker than the dog.

Posted: 01 May 2007, 19:36
by Jeff
The one little section is there because those shingles are shaded by another (higher) segment of the roof.

Posted: 01 May 2007, 19:56
by Rick Cave
How did you get the dog to make that face?

Posted: 04 May 2007, 12:16
by Jeff
I didn't.

Posted: 06 May 2007, 12:53
by Dress Barn
Jeff";p="870764 wrote:Image
This one reminds me of New Years 2001