bbs.bunglefever.com

It's a dumb mainstream rock record that I don't like. I don't give them the benefit of the doubt just because they've both made "art" I enjoy. They're human beings. We all make mistakes. The first Tomahawk LP was great. I tend to remember this forum and people on the Ipecac board acting li...

album sux, dude. oddfellows and southpaw are the only good tunes. shit like "stone letter" should make anyone posting on BUNGLE fever embarrassed. shitty 1997 radio rock.

I forgot I started a band called this. :lol

Album sucks. Pointless exercise, sub late-era FNM rock songs. Pure shit. Their only good one is the self titled. Should've never kicked Rutmanis out of the band. He was the sleaze and cheese that could've kept them good.

Album art reminds me of like the kind of album art you'd see on a Black Sabbath album in 1995, which automatically makes me feel like the music contained within is gonna blow. Might sound superficial, but these sorts of observations occur for a reason.

How's Buzz Osborne taking this news?

Doesn't he want M. Patton's dick all to himself?

*barfs*

Who here rules at Alex Kidd rock paper scissors

because it's what im calling my band

Razor";p="872650 wrote:How so? Were you expecting another Mit Gas or something?

Nah. That one also sucks.

There is usually a 2 year period of people saying a Patton albums sucks before they see it's genius. It somewhat worries me that everybody is liking this album right off of the bat. Even California took a year before most Bungle fans realized how good it was. They expected DV2. Peeping Tom is fanta...

Does everyone seriously like this? This makes Mit Gas look like the album of the decade.

It's like a bad joke, except Peeping Tom was even worse so I know it's no joke.

God, this shit is horrendous. You guys suck.